Regime security and electoral fragility: African perspectives on post-election contestation and the adoption of U.S. Political models
Résumé
Elections are the most vulnerable points in the democratic systems, exposing tensions over legitimacy, institutional capacity and regime security. Many African states have adopted aspects of the United States’ democratic model, including presidentialism, but little scholarship has examined these institutions from African perspectives. This article addresses this gap by focusing on post-election contestation, transfer-of-power processes and the institutional conditions under which losers consent or concede defeat. Using a comparative analytical model that combines institutional process-tracing, cross-national data sets and qualitative case analysis, the study compares the mechanisms of electoral stability in the United States with those in Kenya, Nigeria and Ghana. The findings suggest variation across cases in institutional robustness, electoral governance capacity and elite incentives. Polarization is on the rise in the United States, but institutional buffers appear to be holding steady, while in Africa, electoral fragility varies by context.
Citer ce document
Accès au document
Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter
Voir l'article sur le site de la revueAuteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0