Hybrid tape versus synthetic tape in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence .A prospective clinical study

Résumé

Abstract Objective: To compare the clinical and operative outcomes of hybrid tape versus synthetic tapes during mid-urethral sling in treating female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Patients and methods: This prospective study included 60 women with SUI. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group I included 30 patients who underwent midurethral sling procedure using hybrid tape; and Group II included 30 patients that had synthetic sling, using trans obturator tape approach (TOT) in both groups . The following variables were compared: operative time, post operative pain scores, duration of indwelling urethral catheter, hospital stay, and QoL assessment (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form [ICIQ-UI-SF]) before and after discharge from hospital. Results: Patients among the two groups were normally distributed with no statistically significant difference in patient’s demographic data and comorbidities. There was an obvious increase in operative time in group I compared to group II. This increase was statistically highly significant. (p <0.001). Conclusion: Hybrid tape should be considered as a treatment option during TOT for female SUI with comparable efficacy and safety to synthetic tape. Long term follow up should be considered. Subject classification codes: include these here if the journal requires them

Citer ce document

Accès au document

Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter

Auteur(s)

Statistiques

Consultations : 1

Téléchargements : 0