Accès ouvert

Review of: "Neurotherapeutic Comparison of Aripiprazole and Ethanolic Extract of Fragaria Ananassa on Cerebrum and Amygdala of Methamphetamine Intoxicated Male Wistar Rats"

Article scientifique 2024 Anglais

Résumé

2. The abstract is not properly written, with many flaws in organization, incomplete or fragmented statements, and grammatical errors.3. In the background, there are many "copy and paste" instances; the 1st and 3rd paragraphs are examples of plagiarism (Wikipedia).The objective and the significance of the study are not clearly stated.4. Materials and Methods lack the phytochemistry of the extract, the number of rats used, a toxicology study of the extract, etc.The authors mentioned a histological study in the abstract but no mention of this in the materials and methods, results, or discussion. 5. Results and discussion are poorly written and lack the scientific way of presenting the results and discussing them.6. Conclusion has no relevance to any findings the authors observed.7. Referencing and citations are not according to any standard systems.

Citer ce document

Ekanem, P. (2024). Review of: "Neurotherapeutic Comparison of Aripiprazole and Ethanolic Extract of Fragaria Ananassa on Cerebrum and Amygdala of Methamphetamine Intoxicated Male Wistar Rats". https://doi.org/10.32388/jzs7wq

Accès au document

Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter

Voir l'article sur le site de la revue

Auteur(s)

Statistiques

Consultations : 1

Téléchargements : 0