Comparative Analysis of Local Government Administration in Nigeria and the United States: A Structured Comparative Assessment of Decentralization, Fiscal Autonomy, Administrative Capacity and Service Delivery
Résumé
This study comparatively examines local government administration in Nigeria and the United States through a structured documentary analysis of decentralization, fiscal autonomy, administrative capacity, accountability, and service-delivery conditions. The study responds to a common weakness in cross-national comparisons: treating each country's local governments as homogeneous institutional categories. Rather than characterizing U.S. local governments generally as possessing uniform or broad autonomy, the study recognizes that their authority is constituted principally by state law and varies across states and institutional forms, including counties, municipalities, townships, and special-purpose districts. Similarly, Nigeria is treated as a system with a common constitutional framework but substantial variation in state-local government relations andimplementation practices. The study relies exclusively on secondary evidence from constitutional and legal materials, government statistical publications, judicial decisions, official government reports, and peerreviewed scholarship. A structured comparative framework is used to assess five dimensions: legal/constitutional authority, fiscal capacity and discretion, administrative organization, accountability and participation, and service-delivery capacity. Fiscal evidence from the U.S. Census Bureau shows that U.S. local governments received about 62.6% of local general revenue from sources other than intergovernmental transfers in 2022, while intergovernmental revenue represented about 37.4%. Nigerian evidence demonstrates continued importance of Federation Account transfers, although the 2024 Supreme Court judgment on local government financial autonomy has altered the legal environment. The study therefore avoids the unsupported claim that U.S. local governments are uniformly efficient or that Nigerian councils are uniformly ineffective. Instead, it finds that institutional design, fiscal discretion, administrative professionalism, and accountability arrangements create different enabling conditions for service delivery. The paper concludes that Nigeria should learn selectively from U.S. practices—especially fiscal responsibility, professional management, transparency, performance monitoring, and locally responsive decision-making—while adapting them to Nigeria's constitutional and intergovernmental context.
Citer ce document
Accès au document
Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter
Voir l'article sur le site de la revueAuteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0