Concluding remarks
Résumé
This concluding chapter reflects on the central argument of the book: that the cultivation of humanity is not a peripheral concern but a core educational, moral, and political imperative for higher education in the twenty-first century. Situated within the enduring legacies of colonialism, apartheid, and global inequality, the chapter asserts that universities continue to reproduce forms of exclusion and dehumanisation, often reinforced by neoliberal and bureaucratic institutional cultures. In response, it calls for a fundamental reorientation of higher education towards more humane, relational, and socially just purposes. Drawing on the contributions across the volume, the chapter positions community engagement as a critical—though contested—praxis through which the cultivation of humanity may be enacted. It identifies four interrelated principles that underpin humanising engagement: a reparative orientation grounded in justice and epistemic recognition; the fostering of genuine dialogical encounters across difference; an emphasis on entanglement and interdependence that challenges notions of separateness; and an understanding of humanity as a lived, relational practice rather than an abstract ideal. Together, these principles foreground community engagement as a space for reciprocal learning, ethical reflection, and co-creation of knowledge. At the same time, the chapter cautions against romanticising community engagement, noting that its transformative potential is often constrained by institutional logics that prioritise efficiency, competition, and measurable outputs. Within such contexts, engagement risks becoming instrumentalised or performative. The cultivation of humanity, therefore, requires both structural transformation and sustained relational work—demanding new forms of consciousness, humility, and a willingness to engage in ongoing processes of learning, unlearning, and repair. Importantly, the chapter emphasises that this work is not solely institutional but also deeply personal and collective. It calls on all participants in higher education—students, academics, and communities—to critically reflect on how their everyday practices contribute to or hinder the cultivation of humanity. Rather than offering definitive solutions, the chapter invites continued inquiry, urging readers to “stay with the trouble” and embrace the complexity and incompleteness of this work. Ultimately, the chapter affirms community engagement as a generative and necessary pathway through which universities may reconnect knowledge with life, education with ethical responsibility, and learning with the shared project of becoming more fully human together.
Citer ce document
Accès au document
Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter
Voir l'article sur le site de la revueAuteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0