Hydroxyurea mobile directly observed therapy versus standard monitoring in patients with sickle cell anemia: a phase 2 randomized trial

Résumé

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell anemia (SCA) prevalence remains high in sub-Saharan Africa. Long-term treatment with hydroxyurea (HU) increases survival, however, poor adherence to treatment could limit effectiveness. Whilst HU treatment adherence is currently high, this might decrease over time. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel group phase 2 controlled clinical trial to determine whether mobile Directly Observed Therapy (m-DOT) increases HU treatment adherence (NCT02844673). Eligible participants were adults with homozygous SCA. People on a chronic blood transfusion program, with hemoglobin (Hb) A levels greater than 20% of the total Hb, total Hb less than 4 g/dL, pregnant or HIV positive were excluded. After a 3-month pre-treatment period participants were randomized to either m-DOT or standard monitoring arm. All participants received smart mobile phones and were treated with HU (15 mg/kg) daily for three months. In the m-DOT arm, drug intake was video recorded on cell phone by the participant and the video sent to the study team. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of m-DOT on adherence to HU treatment by medication possession ratio (MPR). RESULTS: Of the 86 participants randomized, 76 completed the trial (26.13 ± 6.97 years, 63.5 % female). Adherence was high (MPR > 95 %) in both groups, 29 (80.6 %) in m-DOT versus 37 (94.9 %) in the standard monitoring arm (P = 0.079). No HU treatment was withheld from participants due to safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: m-DOT did not increase adherence to HU treatment. We recommend that further testing in larger trials with a longer follow up period be undertaken.

Citer ce document

Accès au document

Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter

Auteur(s)

Statistiques

Consultations : 1

Téléchargements : 0