Narratives of neglect: a multi stakeholder narrative analysis of grade 8 and 9 underperformance in rural South African schools

Résumé

Academic underperformance in the General Education and Training (GET) band, particularly in Grades 8 and 9, remains a persistent crisis in rural South African districts. While substantial policy attention and resources are directed toward Grade 12 outcomes, the foundational years of secondary education suffer from systemic neglect, creating a critical gap in understanding the drivers of early secondary school failure. This qualitative study explores the contributing factors to underperformance among Grade 8 and 9 learners in Mopani West Education District, Limpopo Province, by examining the perspectives of five stakeholder groups: learners, teachers, principals, curriculum advisors, and School Governing Body (SGB) members. Utilizing a multi-stakeholder qualitative design grounded in narrative inquiry, data were collected through focus group interviews and analyzed using narrative analysis to identify convergent and divergent narratives. Four interconnected narrative domains emerged. First, a pervasive narrative of systematic neglect of the GET phase, with all stakeholders acknowledging a disproportionate prioritization of Grade 12 that leaves Grades 8 and 9 critically under-resourced. Second, foundational educational gaps were universally identified as a primary driver of failure, with learners transitioning to secondary school without basic literacy and numeracy skills. Third, socio-economic factors such as child-headed households, poverty, unemployment, and substance abuse were narrated as creating insurmountable barriers. Fourth, policy contradictions—including automatic progression, the abolition of corporal punishment without viable alternatives, and inconsistent language policies—were criticized for exacerbating challenges. Critically, competing narratives emerged regarding accountability: teachers and principals emphasized parental disengagement and learner ill discipline, while learners highlighted hostile school environments, teacher absenteeism, and emotional and physical abuse. This study concludes that Grade 8 and 9 underperformance represents a complex interplay of systemic neglect, socio-economic deprivation, policy misalignment, and fractured accountability. Addressing this crisis requires coordinated, multi level interventions that move beyond a Grade 12-centric approach, prioritizing foundational secondary education and centering the voices of learners in policy and practice.

Citer ce document

Accès au document

Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter

Auteur(s)

Statistiques

Consultations : 1

Téléchargements : 0