Online, remote public deliberation across three continents: learnings from the MindKind Study (Preprint)
Résumé
BACKGROUND Public deliberation is a qualitative research method that has successfully been used to solicit lay people’s perspectives on health ethics topics, but questions remain as to whether this traditionally in-person method translates into the online context. The MindKind Study conducted public deliberation sessions to gauge the concerns and aspirations of young people in India, South Africa, and the United Kingdom in regard to a prospective mental health databank. This paper details our adaptations to and evaluation of the public deliberation method in the online context, especially in the presence of a digital divide. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this paper is to assess the quality of online public deliberation and share emerging learnings in a remote disseminated qualitative research context. METHODS We convened participants for 2 hours of structured deliberation over an online video conferencing platform. We provided participants with multimedia informational materials describing different ways to manage mental health data. We analyzed the quality of online public deliberation in variable resource settings on the basis of (1) equal participation, (2) respect for the opinions of others, (3) adoption of a societal perspective, and (4) reasoned justification of ideas. In order to assess the depth of comprehension of informational materials, we used qualitative data pertaining directly to the material provided. RESULTS The sessions were broadly of high quality, although some sessions suffered from unstable internet connection and resulting multimodal participation, complicating our ability to perform a quality assessment. English-speaking participants displayed a deep understanding of complex informational materials. We found that participants were particularly sensitive to linguistic and semiotic choices in informational materials. A more fundamental barrier to understanding was encountered by participants who utilized materials translated from English. CONCLUSIONS Although online public deliberation may produce similar quality outcomes to in-person public deliberation, researchers who utilize remote methods should plan for technological and linguistic barriers when working with a multinational population. Our recommendations to researchers include budgetary planning, logistical considerations, and ensuring participants’ psychological safety.
Citer ce document
Accès au document
Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter
Voir l'article sur le site de la revueAuteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0