Review of: "Evaluation of Musical Conductors' Exposure to Noise"
Résumé
CommentsThe study evaluates occupational noise exposures among a musical conductor in a musical hall.Hence, the overall presentation of the manuscript is fair enough, but the paper needs major revision for it to be considered for publication.1.The author is suggested to unbold the abstract section.The word count should not exceed 100.2. The author should also include ve keywords.Note that a short communication should not be more than 3000 words, including the abstract, captions, and references.Hence, the references should not be more than ten.3. Materials and Methods Section: The author is suggested to rename this section as "Materials and Methods".Moreover, Table 1 in the Results Section should be moved to the Materials and Methods section.Rather than having a sub-heading called "b) Daily Activity Log, " which should be completely removed, the author is suggested to have a sub-heading that integrates "Study Research Approach, " such as Research Design, Experimental Procedure for Noise Level Measurement (Duration, Period, Number of Participants, Year), and Statistical Analysis.Note that all this explanation should not exceed 200 words.4. Results and Discussions: The author is suggested to merge the results and discussion sections together.Moreover, the author is suggested to input tables immediately after each explanation for easy and clear Qeios qeios.
Citer ce document
Accès au document
Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter
Voir l'article sur le site de la revueAuteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0