Review of: "Perceptions and Attitudes about COVID-19 Vaccines Regarding Vaccine Intention and Hesitancy of Attendants of a Healthcare Center in Northern Cyprus"
Résumé
In the method section, the authors used the phrase..The differences between the groups were evaluated using the chi square test.It appeared the authors were conducting a comparative study.The authors could kindly check that sentence. Method:i.The authors indicated that they employed a descriptive cross sectional study design for the study.There should be a HEADING TITLED: Study design that will specifically look at the study design.ii.I think the use of descriptive cross sectional study design is not appropriate for the study.Considering that the exposures and outcomes variables were simultaneously measured at the study same time.Hence analytical cross sectional study would have been more appropriate. Sampling MethodThe authors employed convenience sampling method.This sampling method is often used in qualitative studies.Could the authors have employed a quantitative sampling method? Outcome MeasurementThe authors could kindly check to reconcile what they have put as dependent variables and outcome measurement. Pre test of questionnaireThe authors could kindly tell the reader whether the people used for the pilot study were the same participants used for the main work or were different people.
Citer ce document
Accès au document
Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter
Voir l'article sur le site de la revueAuteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0