Correction: Measurable impacts of South Africa's just energy transition partnership on poverty reduction and economic opportunities in marginalized communities
Résumé
A correction refers to a change to their article that the author wishes to publish after publication. The publication of this article is subject to Frontiers' editorial approval.Instructions:• Please read through all the templates before choosing • Pick the most relevant text template(s) from the following page and delete all others.• Edit the text as necessary, ensuring that the original incorrect text is included for the record, please see the below. • Please do not use any extra formatting when editing the templates, and only modify the red text unless absolutely necessary • Submit to Frontiers following the instructions on this page.When the original text contained incorrect information, to preserve the scientific record, please include that text when editing the below templates. For example:There was a mistake in the Funding statement, an incorrect number was used.The correct number is "2015C03Bd051.". The publisher apologizes for this mistake.The original version of this article has been updated. Adding/removing text [state the error that was made] Although Figure 1 was corrected during the author proof stage, the accompanying text was not updated accordingly to reflect the corrected figures. The number of studies that remained in the description is 25, not 29. This is correctly reflected in Figure 1; however, some sections of the text still state 29 instead of 25 and therefore need to be corrected. A correction has been made to the section [2.4 Results of the systematic review]:"[insert corrected paragraph]"The systematic review process began with the identification of 3,421 papers from selected databases, including ProQuest Central, Sabinet African Journals, and Scopus. A Rigorous Screening Process then eliminated duplicate records (411), papers deemed ineligible by automation tools (2108), and other records excluded for various reasons (902), leaving 107 papers for further evaluation. Follow-up title and abstract screening resulted in the exclusion of 47 papers that did not meet the inclusion criteria, leaving 64 full-text reports for retrieval. However, 4 reports could not be accessed, reducing the number of full texts assessed to 60. Further review of these full texts led to the exclusion of 35 studies that did not meet the research criteria. Ultimately, 25 papers satisfied all inclusion requirements and were included in the final systematic review. This process is visually represented in Figure 1 The original version of this article has been updated.for a reason not seen here, please contact the journal's editorial office.
Citer ce document
Accès au document
Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter
Voir l'article sur le site de la revueAuteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0