Accès ouvert

Cocoa climate-smart agriculture adoption in Ghana: why the synergies and trade-offs matter for policy

Article scientifique 2026 Anglais

Résumé

The role of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) in sustainable cocoa production cannot be ignored. However, studies on perceived effectiveness and the socio-economic drivers of CSA among cocoa farmers are underexplored. This study fills the gap by using Spearman’s rank correlation and a multivariate probit model with 455 cocoa farmers in Ghana. Results show high adoption of agroforestry (93.48%) and hybrid planting materials (86.30%), moderate uptake of lining and pegging (52%) and cover cropping (49%), and relatively low adoption of irrigation (23%), drainage construction (30%) and off-farm diversification (33%). Most farmers perceive agroforestry, hybrid varieties, lining and pegging, and cover cropping as effective or highly effective in reducing the impacts of climate variability. In contrast, a large proportion are uncertain about the benefits of off-farm diversification, irrigation, and drainage, revealing important information and perception gaps. There are positive and significant correlations among perceived effectiveness scores (on-farm and off-farm diversification; SWC and drainage). The study found that farming experience, farm size, household size, climate information, distance to the farm, ICT ownership, membership of farmer-based organizations, and regional location significantly shape the adoption of CSA practices. Hence, to promote sustainable cocoa production, a climate-smart cocoa policy should recognize both the complementarities and trade-offs among CSA practices. Therefore, cocoa policymakers should strengthen extension and climate information systems, promote integrated, context-specific CSA packages, improve access to irrigation, and support farmer organizations.

Citer ce document

Zuobog, P., Issahaku, G., Mabe, F., Zakaria, A., Baba, A. (2026). Cocoa climate-smart agriculture adoption in Ghana: why the synergies and trade-offs matter for policy. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1857724

Accès au document

Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter

Voir l'article sur le site de la revue

Statistiques

Consultations : 1

Téléchargements : 0