Review of: "School instability in South Africa: a Systematic Review of Reflections and Experiences for a way forward"
Résumé
Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare. ReviewFor a systematic review, one must follow guidelines such as those set out by Cochrane (Garritty et al., 2020) or PRISMA-RR (Stevens et al., 2018).None such guidelines are mentioned in the article.Usually with a systematic review there is a "review" team of an "information" team.For example, once literature has been identified to be included in the systematic review, each team member would independently review the abstracts and make a decision on whether on not the literature should be included in the review.Where team members disagree, they need to keep up the discussions until a consensus is reached.But it can go even further than this to where you not only want two or more specialists in the field, but you also want, for example, and information specialist to be on board to assist with searching for documents.I don't see any mention of an information specialist being on board and any steps to how articles were selected.At best, this article appears as a "traditional" review and not a "systematic" review, as there is no mention of the keywords-
Citer ce document
Accès au document
Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter
Voir l'article sur le site de la revueAuteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0