Balancing rights and public safety: A comparative review of Arrest and Bail Reform in South Africa, Canada, and India
Résumé
This paper examines the ongoing debate on arrest and bail reform in South Africa, focusing on the constitutional values of dignity, equality, and personal liberty. It responds to concerns about arbitrary arrests, prolonged pre-trial detention, and the unequal application of bail laws that often disadvantage poor and vulnerable groups. Central to the discussion are the South African Law Reform Commission’s proposed amendments to the Criminal Procedure Act, which offer an opportunity to better align legal practice with constitutional principles. This article addresses the following questions: (i) how South Africa’s bail procedures fall short of constitutional and international norms; (ii) what the SALRC’s proposals offer in addressing fairness, access, and accountability; (iii) how a balanced bail regime can protect individual freedoms and public safety; and (iv) what comparative lessons can be drawn from Canada and India on judicial oversight, risk-based assessments, and custodial review. Using a qualitative, desktop-based research method and drawing on relevant case law, legislation, and existing literature, the article found that meaningful reform requires more than technical amendments. This article recommends clearer legal standards, improved training for police and judicial officers, and the use of evidence-based tools for consistent decision-making. Following on the existing literature, this study contributes by concluding that modernising arrest and bail laws is essential to protect the presumption of innocence and restore confidence in South Africa’s criminal justice system.
Citer ce document
Accès au document
Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter
Voir l'article sur le site de la revueAuteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0