Review of: "Recognition Ambiguity! Kenya’s Foreign Policy Towards Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Israel, And Palestine Under Moi Era (1978-1990)"

Résumé

Review -aim, methodology adopted, key or anticipated findings, conclusion and recommendations Grammar -cornerstone is one word History of Kenya and MoiFirst few sentences should be appropriately referenced.Also instead of beginning the paragraph with the History of Kenya, it should re-introduce the aim of the paper followed by the history.Review grammar.For example, under history of Kenya there are two sentences which start with 'it attempts…, and it has been criticized…'.These two sentences should be merged into one.Stansifer page references should not be included.The content within the paragraph to me does not seem to be a direct quote.Therefore, p.251-272 should be dropped.References should be consistent.For example, (Munene, 1997) normal text while (Nyamura, 1992, p.12) in italics.Also insertion of page numbers normally associated with direct quotes.Otherwise, author(s) may paraphrase. ReferencingReview referencing formats and use one style.For example, on page 4, (Hull, Reuters.2007) is incorrect. The United StatesThat section should be removed from the paper.The study aim in the abstract, which is consistent with the title, focuses on the Middle East but suddenly the author mentions US.Its value is not made clear. Research parametersThis section should also be included under the Moi literature.

Citer ce document

Accès au document

Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter

Voir l'article sur le site de la revue

Auteur(s)

Statistiques

Consultations : 1

Téléchargements : 0