OF IMPLICATION, INSINUATION AND INCITEMENT R v Jones [2010] 3 All ER 1186 (CA)
Résumé
Can the crime of incitement be committed by insinuation? Can a conversation about growing tomatoes by implication actually be aconversation about the crime of producing cannabis? These are the questions which arise from the recent English case of R v Jones ([2010] 3 All ER 1186 (CA)). Although the English law relating to the way in which encouraging crime is criminalised has recently changed, the similarities between the previous (common-law) position in England (which was the law to be applied in Jones) and the current South African law make for a useful comparison between these systems, and it is to this that we now turn.
Citer ce document
Accès au document
Voir sur le dépôt sourceCe document est hébergé sur son dépôt institutionnel d'origine.
Auteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0