Does Psychological Distress Interact With Patients’ Illness and Treatment Perceptions to Predict Adherence to Dietary Recommendation Among Persons With T2DM in Ghana? A Facility Based Cross Sectional Survey

Résumé

Abstract Background: Psychological distress is a pervasive condition that interacts with other factors to influence adherence to treatment regimens, yet information-gap exists on how psychological-distress interact with Type-2-Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients’ perceptions about their disease state and treatment benefits for adherence to dietary-recommendation. This study therefore investigates how T2DM patients’ psychological-distress interacts with perception about disease state and treatment benefits for adherence to dietary-recommendation. Methods: Facility-based cross-sectional-study was conducted among 530 T2DM patients at six health-facilities in Ghana. Structured-questionnaires were used to collect socio-demographics data, and Health Belief Model (HBM) questionnaires used to assess perceived-beliefs. Perceived-Dietary-Adherence-Questionnaire (PDAQ) for T2DM patients was used to assess adherence to dietary-recommendation. SPSS version-22 was used in data analysis.Results: Weight, diabetes-duration, total-cholesterol, HbA1c and fasting-blood-sugar were statistically significant for adherence to dietary-recommendation (P-value <0.05). Perceived-Susceptibility, Perceived-Benefit and Perceived-Cue to action were statistically significant for adherence to dietary-recommendations (P-value <0.05). After adjusting for confounders, interaction between low-psychological-distress and moderately-perceive-susceptibility[Adjusted Odd ratio(Adj.OR: 0.21, 95% confidence interval CI:1.18, 9.83); interaction between high-psychological-distress and moderately-perceived-susceptibility (Adj.OR: 4.49, 95% CI: 1.41, 14.28); interaction between low-psychological distress and highly-perceived-benefit (Adj.OR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.30, 6.62); interaction between low-psychological-distress and moderately-perceived-barriers (Adj. OR: 4.79, 95% CI: 1.82, 12.60) and interaction between moderate-psychological-distress and highly-perceived-cue to action (Adj. OR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.36, 4.50) were statistically significant for adherence to dietary-recommendations. Conclusion: Psychological-distress can interact with patients’ perceptions for adherence to dietary recommendation. Therefore, health care workers globally should be mindful of this and offer professional care.

Citer ce document

Accès au document

Ce document est hébergé sur son dépôt institutionnel d'origine.

Auteur(s)

Statistiques

Consultations : 1

Téléchargements : 0