Big five and higher-order personality traits matter for climate-risk perception among moroccan farmers
Résumé
Climate change risk perception is increasingly recognized as an important antecedent of climate-related engagement, yet its psychological foundations remain underexplored in vulnerable, non-WEIRD contexts. This study examines associations between personality traits and affective climate-risk perception (denoting climate-related worry), among cereal farmers in Morocco. Drawing on the Big five and higher-order meta-trait personality framework, we model affective climate-risk perception as a function of both individual traits and their composite configurations. Using cross-sectional data from cereal-farming households, we estimate these associations through different analytical specifications. Results show that personality traits are significantly associated with affective climate-risk perception. At the trait level, Emotional Stability is consistently linked to lower levels of reported climate-related worry, whereas Extraversion and Openness are associated with higher worry. The findings suggest that engagement-oriented and information-seeking dispositions correspond with heightened emotional sensitivity to climate threats. At the meta-trait level, Meta-Plasticity is positively associated with affective climate-risk perception, whereas Meta-Stability is associated with lower worry. Exploratory composite configurations further reveal a non-linear, U-shaped association for a Social Harmony orientation. This indicates that moderate social embeddedness may coincide with lower concern, while very high levels are associated with increased affective climate-risk perception. Overall, the findings do not imply causal effects on behavior but demonstrate that perceived affective climate-risk is patterned along stable psychological dimensions, even under similar exposure conditions. By integrating these personality traits into affect-based climate-risk frameworks, this study highlights the role of psychological heterogeneity in shaping farmers' responses to climate-risks and underscores the need for more targeted adaptation, climate communication, and resilience-building strategies in vulnerable agricultural communities.
Citer ce document
Accès au document
Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter
Voir l'article sur le site de la revueAuteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0