Accès ouvert
Unscrambling jurisdiction under the PEPUDA
Résumé
The jurisdiction, or competence of the Equality Court to hear a dispute concerning alleged hate speech is affected by various jurisdictional factors. The decision in South African Human Rights Commission v Khumalo EQ6-2016, EQ1-2018 2018 ZAGPJHC 528; 2019 1 SA 289 (GJ); 2019 1 All SA 254 (GJ) reveals several shortcomings in the provisions regulating jurisdiction in the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 which must be attended to in order to provide clarity and legitimacy in regard to the application of the protection against hate speech.
Citer ce document
Geldenhuys, J., Kelly-Louw, M.
(2020). Unscrambling jurisdiction under the PEPUDA.
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a7145
Accès au document
Voir sur le dépôt sourceCe document est hébergé sur son dépôt institutionnel d'origine.
Auteur(s)
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0