Accès ouvert

Review of: "Climate Change Denial Theories, Skeptical Arguments, and the Role of Science Communication"

Article scientifique 2024 Anglais

Résumé

Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare.1.The section on denying the roles of humans in climate change should ideally be part of earlier arguments that suggest that firstly there is data manipulation/falsification by scientists and secondly that there are violations of scientific peer review principles in climate change research.This, in my opinion, also aligns with the argument advanced in the separate section about denying the role of humans in climate change. 1 and2 were just dumped on the readers with vain reference in passing.One expects that the authors should make references to the data brandished in the two figures to further buttress the point being made. Figures

Citer ce document

Olajide, B. (2024). Review of: "Climate Change Denial Theories, Skeptical Arguments, and the Role of Science Communication". https://doi.org/10.32388/6rrwvx

Accès au document

Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter

Voir l'article sur le site de la revue

Auteur(s)

Bamidele Emmanuel Olajide

Statistiques

Consultations : 1

Téléchargements : 0